Journal 29 vs. Journal 29 Revelation
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 2:14 pm
Curious to know if I'm the only one who found the sequel to be much more difficult, but not necessarily for the right reasons -- i.e. large leaps of logic / having to make connections between pages that are not clearly linked, etc.
I found the original book very fun/entertaining. There were a few puzzles I did not like, but that's inevitable with something like this. There were a lot more of those in this sequel, however. Perhaps I just wasn't as patient as when I played the first book. There were some in this edition that I really liked, but I found myself going to the hints board way more often. Admittedly there were a few times when my responses (after looking at hints) was to think something was clever and I should have thought of it. More often, however, I thought that I never would have made that connection, leading me to question how good of a puzzle it is.
Maybe I'm alone in this.
I found the original book very fun/entertaining. There were a few puzzles I did not like, but that's inevitable with something like this. There were a lot more of those in this sequel, however. Perhaps I just wasn't as patient as when I played the first book. There were some in this edition that I really liked, but I found myself going to the hints board way more often. Admittedly there were a few times when my responses (after looking at hints) was to think something was clever and I should have thought of it. More often, however, I thought that I never would have made that connection, leading me to question how good of a puzzle it is.
Maybe I'm alone in this.